HOME
home 
icg نبذة حول 
البرامج
  إفريقيا 
  آسيا 
  أوروبا 
  أمريكا اللاتينية 
  الشرق الأوسط 
  أعداد 
التقارير
  حسب المنطقة 
  حسب التاريخ 
  حسب الكلمة الرئيسية 
كرايسز ووتش 
إعلام
  media releases 
  articles/op. eds 
  speeches 
  contact media director 
للاتصال 
دعم المجموعة الدولية لمعالجة الأزمات 
شواغر 
روابط 

 subscribe
 home  programs  europe  balkans  macedonia
search
 
 

Macedonia: No Time for Complacency


Skopje/Brussels, 23 October 2003: Macedonia is not yet the "success story" of the Balkans as it is often portrayed. In fact, it is an underperforming post-conflict country still very much at risk from ethnic tensions, rampant criminality, pervasive corruption, and economic feebleness that needs to retain an international security force.

The International Crisis Group’s new report, Macedonia: No Time for Complacency,* insists a more realistic assessment is necessary for a country that narrowly avoided war in 2001 to secure long-term stability. After a string of violent events, security concerns are paramount. The Macedonian government needs to ask the European Union to keep its "Concordia" military mission in country beyond the 15 December end date – at least until the EU’s "Proxima" police mission is fully established.

"The EU has done a good job over the past half year in picking up where NATO left off – its first military mission ever. But the need is still there. Macedonia’s leaders and Brussels must realise that the country continues to require outside troops", says Nicholas Whyte, Director of the Europe Program at ICG, "and that force must be active in on-the-ground situations, not merely have a monitoring role”.

The moderate government led by Prime Minister Branko Crvenkovski and former rebel leader Ali Ahmeti has had some successes. Both leaders are committed to the Ohrid peace agreement and national unity, and they have acted responsibly and, at times, even courageously on sensitive matters.

However, progress on symbolic issues has not been matched by progress on substance. Security sector reform has lagged as has decentralisation and efforts to boost Albanian public sector employment – all key components of the Ohrid agreement. A high profile crackdown on corruption has stumbled, unemployment remains high, and the prospect of further instability keeps foreign investors wary.

Macedonia’s leaders and international mediators too often approach challenges with complacency. They fail to confront the radicalism of high-profile politicians who openly undermine Ohrid and even urge Macedonia’s ethnic partition. Ohrid deadlines often slip without comment. A number of issues left over from the 2001 fighting remains unaddressed.

Most seriously, criminals and extremists continue to present a direct threat. The police increasingly reflect the multiethnic population’s make-up but still struggle to impose law and order in the face of rising violent crime and growing lawlessness. Poor communication on security matters often stokes ethnic tensions within the government and between communities; this, rather than any organised "pan-Albanian" violence, is the greatest current risk to stability.

Without a more concerted effort to implement Ohrid, establish law and order, fight corruption, and stimulate the economy, the relative calm could soon unravel. "The steps Macedonia and the international community must take are clear, but they require a more sober, less self-congratulatory assessment of the track record", said Edward Joseph, former director of ICG’s Macedonia Project.


Contacts: Andrew Stroehlein (Brussels) +32 (0) 485 555 946
Jennifer Leonard (Washington) +1-202-785 1601
To contact ICG media please click here
*Read the report in full on our website: http://www.crisisweb.org/


go to report or briefing

comments


copyright privacy sitemap