P R E S S R E L E A S E
ICG Analysis of 1997 Municipal Election Results
Four weeks after the municipal elections in Bosnia were held on 13-14 September, the Provisional Election Commission (PEC) has finally published and technically certified all of the results. The Organisation for Security and Co-operation's (OSCE) original estimate called for the results to be published within one to two weeks of the elections. Councils were elected in 135 municipalities - 74 in the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina (Federation) and 61 in the Republika Srpska (RS). In the Central Zone of Mostar (one of the seven municipalities comprising the city), voters were given the choice of casting ballots in one of the other six city municipalities. In addition, voters in Mostar elected a council for the entire city. The voter turnout was as follows:
Throughout the country 4,789 municipal council members were elected - 2,118 in the Federation and 2,671 in the RS. On average, each council member represents 519 registered voters - 635 in the Federation and 417 in the RS. As expected, the three ruling parties won a clear majority of the council seats, a total of 3,230 (67%) - 1,719 (81%) in the Federation and 1,511 (57%) in the RS. Non-national parties (those which do not exclusively represent the rights of one national group) won 299 (6%) of council seats throughout the country - 250 (12%) in the Federation and 49 (2%) in the RS. Also, independent candidates faired poorly, with only 13 elected throughout the country - seven in the Federation and six in the RS. Only in one municipality, Tuzla, did non-national parties win a majority (63%) of the council seats.
In the six municipalities of Mostar, the SDA Coalition and HDZ won all 139 council seats, each of them retaining control of "their" three municipalities on either side of the Neretva river divide. In addition, the two ruling parties won all 24 of the city council seats, with the SDA Coalition winning 14 seats and control of the council. While the SDS lost considerable ground in the RS winning only 980 (37%) of the seats, its more extremist partner SRS won 509 (19%) of the seats. In municipalities west of Brcko, an area largely controlled by police loyal to RS President Biljana Plavsic, the SDS polled only 34% and the SRS 11% of the seats, as opposed to Brcko and east where the SDS won 40% and the SRS 28%. The remaining votes cast by Bosnian Serbs in the RS were divided between the SPRS (loyal to President Slobodan Milosevic of the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia) with 11% and a plethora of smaller Serb national parties. In Banja Luka, President Plavsic's stronghold, the SDS and SRS combined won only 11 out of 70 seats. The SPRS won 12 seats and other Serb national parties won 26. The non-national Serb parties won only 8 seats, the SDA 9 seats and the HDZ 4 seats. In Brcko, 56 council seats were contested. Serb national parties won 30 seats (17 SDS, 7 SRS, and 6 SPRS) and the remaining 26 (46%) were distributed between the SDA Coalition with 16 seats, the HDZ with 3 seats, and SDP with 7 seats.
Thus in addition to the six municipalities where the displaced voters won a majority of the council seats, in 89 (66%) of the municipalities throughout the country, many displaced voters chose to cast their ballots in their pre-war municipalities and elected representatives to the councils, thus clearly expressing their wish to return to their homes across the inter-entity or former confrontation lines. In half of those municipalities, the displaced won a significant minority of council seats. This outcome puts to rest the myth that the people of Bosnia and Herzegovina do not wish to return to their pre-war homes and they do not wish to live with people of different religion. The analysis tables below summarise the findings detailed above: |
Municipal Councillors Elected by Political Groupings | |||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Political Parties |
SDA Coalition |
HDZ |
SDS |
Total Ruling |
SRS |
All Nat. |
Non Nat. |
Ind. |
Total |
||||||||
Federation | |||||||||||||||||
Bosniac areas | 844 | 69% | 68 | 6% | 0 | 0% | 912 | 75% | 0 | 0% | 984 | 80% | 236 | 19% | 3 | 0% | 1,223 |
Croat areas | 154 | 24% | 420 | 65% | 0 | 0% | 574 | 89% | 0 | 0% | 638 | 99% | 2 | 0% | 4 | 1% | 644 |
mixed areas | 123 | 49% | 110 | 44% | 0 | 0% | 233 | 93% | 0 | 0% | 239 | 95% | 12 | 5% | 0 | 0% | 251 |
Total | 1,121 | 53% | 598 | 28% | 0 | 0% | 1,719 | 81% | 0 | 0% | 1,861 | 88% | 250 | 12% | 7 | 0% | 2,118 |
Rep. Srpska | |||||||||||||||||
West of Brcko | 201 | 14% | 40 | 3% | 478 | 34% | 719 | 51% | 161 | 11% | 1,353 | 96% | 49 | 3% | 4 | 0% | 1,406 |
Brcko and east | 287 | 23% | 3 | 0% | 502 | 40% | 792 | 63% | 348 | 28% | 1,263 | 100% | 0 | 0% | 2 | 0% | 1,265 |
Total | 488 | 18% | 43 | 2% | 980 | 37% | 1,511 | 57% | 509 | 19% | 2,616 | 98% | 49 | 2% | 6 | 0% | 2,671 |
Total | 1,609 | 34% | 641 | 13% | 980 | 20% | 3,230 | 67% | 509 | 11% | 4,477 | 93% | 299 | 6% | 13 | 0% | 4,789 |
Minority Councillors Elected by Municipality | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Minority Council Members Elected |
Munis with 0% |
Munis with <20% |
Munis with 20-49% |
Munis with 50%+ |
Number of Munis |
||||
Federation | |||||||||
Bosniac areas | 19 | 44% | 20 | 47% | 3 | 7% | 1 | 2% | 43 |
Croat areas | 3 | 13% | 6 | 25% | 11 | 46% | 4 | 17% | 24 |
mixed areas | 8 | ||||||||
Total | 22 | 29% | 26 | 35% | 14 | 19% | 5 | 7% | 75 |
Rep. Srpska | |||||||||
West of Brcko | 7 | 24% | 9 | 31% | 13 | 45% | 0 | 0% | 29 |
Brcko and east | 3 | 10% | 12 | 39% | 15 | 48% | 1 | 3% | 31 |
Total | 10 | 17% | 21 | 35% | 28 | 47% | 1 | 2% | 60 |
Total | 32 | 24% | 47 | 35% | 42 | 31% | 6 | 4% | 135 |
For further information contact ICG Sarajevo on +38-7-71-447-845, ICG Brussels on +322-502-9038 or send e-mail here
The International Crisis Group (ICG) is a private, multinational crisis prevention organisation. Founded in London in July 1995, ICG has established major field assessment programs in Bosnia, Albania, Macedonia, Serbia and Sierra Leone. New programs are planned for the Democratic Republic of Congo, Rwanda, Burundi and Cambodia. ICG recently relocated its international headquarters from London to Brussels and opened a Washington bureau which is responsible for advocacy in North America. |